What people actually search before they find a new artist
Search behaviour around music discovery, and what it means for how you title things.
There is a gap between how artists label their work and how listeners look for it.
Nobody searches your song title
Until they have heard it. Search is not how people find new music; it is how they find music again.
The practical implication: your song title is not a discovery mechanism, and optimising it for search is wasted effort. What it needs to be is memorable and spellable, because the search that matters is the one someone does two days later when a fragment is stuck in their head.
What people actually type
Three kinds of query dominate.
Lyric fragments. Half-remembered, often misheard. This is the single most common way someone finds a song again.
Descriptions. Afrobeats song with the whistle. Amapiano log drum slow. People describe what they cannot name.
Adjacency. Artists like [someone]. This is where new artists actually get found, and it is the one you have some influence over.
What follows
Publish your lyrics. Not for aesthetics — because lyric fragments are how people find songs again, and a page containing your actual words is what they land on. Most independent artists skip this entirely.
Describe your sound in plain words somewhere public. Your bio should contain the words a person would use, not the words a press release would. Amapiano and highlife, mostly slow is more findable than genre-defying sonic architect.
Let comparison happen. Being described as adjacent to a bigger artist is not a loss of identity, it is a discovery route. The people arriving through it are people who already like that sound.
One caution
All of this is worth about a tenth of what a single well-placed share by someone with an audience is worth. Search is a way to be found again, not a way to be found first. Do it because it is cheap, not because it is the strategy.